calibusje
Top Poster
VIP Member
- Messages
- 1,482
- Vehicle
- T6.1 Coast 150
The inventors question: is the vw bus a pre-war model? And found by Porsche? A forgotten patent from 1939 discovered some years ago that seems to anticipate the characteristics of the cult transporter. Does the history of the Bulli drawn by Bernardus Pon in 1947 have to be rewritten?
Pon was a seller, not a designed and will certainly have said that he could use a small utility vehicle and even sketched something like that, but whether he drew from his own idea is doubtful. It is very likely that he had known the pre war Citroën TUB: a small utility van; also Porsche must have know that citroën and therefore draw the chassis for a volkswagen (kdf) based utility vehicle. That 1939 patent has recognizable beetle dna: central tube frame, engine with standing blower box over the rear axle, the whole thing, however, expanded by a steep steering column and a driver's seat directly over the front axle. The patent claim: chassis for motor vehicles, in which the driver's seat is extended to the front to accommodate a large utility or loading area.
So, there is a German patent from 1939. It had a model construction drawing. Fig.1 & 2 a chassis for a small utility vehicle and Fig. 3 for a car... the beetle.
No doubt about it: this is the layout for the transporter that the Dutch importer drew with a few pen stripes in... 1947.
This picture shows a T1 above the Fig. 1 from the patent:
The design of the chassis for the utility vehicle was rejected by 'volkswagen' then due to not being strong enough. All this from an article by AutoBild Klassik from 2016 that I read then and thought I lost the magazine. Found it back today.
There are no more documents at volkswagen referring to this design but they had very quick the chassis for 'Ben Pons drawing'... with the same weaknesses as that of the 1939 design but now they did improve it. More questions: Do they not want Porsche to be known as the designer of the transporter? And if so, why? Porsche themselves apparently don't know anything about it or... don't want to know anymore because it was a rejected design? Could Ben Pon have known about the design in the patent?
I don't know more about this and never read nothing more about it because I couldn't find more. It intrigues me hence the question: does anyone know more about this?
Greetings
Calibusje
Pon was a seller, not a designed and will certainly have said that he could use a small utility vehicle and even sketched something like that, but whether he drew from his own idea is doubtful. It is very likely that he had known the pre war Citroën TUB: a small utility van; also Porsche must have know that citroën and therefore draw the chassis for a volkswagen (kdf) based utility vehicle. That 1939 patent has recognizable beetle dna: central tube frame, engine with standing blower box over the rear axle, the whole thing, however, expanded by a steep steering column and a driver's seat directly over the front axle. The patent claim: chassis for motor vehicles, in which the driver's seat is extended to the front to accommodate a large utility or loading area.
So, there is a German patent from 1939. It had a model construction drawing. Fig.1 & 2 a chassis for a small utility vehicle and Fig. 3 for a car... the beetle.
No doubt about it: this is the layout for the transporter that the Dutch importer drew with a few pen stripes in... 1947.
This picture shows a T1 above the Fig. 1 from the patent:
The design of the chassis for the utility vehicle was rejected by 'volkswagen' then due to not being strong enough. All this from an article by AutoBild Klassik from 2016 that I read then and thought I lost the magazine. Found it back today.
There are no more documents at volkswagen referring to this design but they had very quick the chassis for 'Ben Pons drawing'... with the same weaknesses as that of the 1939 design but now they did improve it. More questions: Do they not want Porsche to be known as the designer of the transporter? And if so, why? Porsche themselves apparently don't know anything about it or... don't want to know anymore because it was a rejected design? Could Ben Pon have known about the design in the patent?
I don't know more about this and never read nothing more about it because I couldn't find more. It intrigues me hence the question: does anyone know more about this?
Greetings
Calibusje
Last edited: