
Amarillo
Tom
Super Poster
VIP Member
In 1990 I bought my first home: £57,000 with £17,000 deposit and £40,000 mortgage.
By 2005 the mortgage had been repaid, and I had 6 years of glorious mortgage free living.
In 2011 Clare and I bought a house together. £348,000, with £120,000 from a buy-to-let mortgage on my first home and a £228,000 mortgage on the house we bought. Clare had her own flat which she also rented out. We both worked full time and we each had rental incomes.
Rental income on my old flat and rental income from Clare's flat more or less covered both mortgages.
We are now in the fortunate position where we might go mortgage free again in three or four years time.
Can we risk repeating the trick to buy our dream home for retirement?
Mortgage our current home with a 60% buy-to-let loan.
Use that 60% as a 40% deposit on a Retirement Interest Only (RIO) mortgage for our dream seafront retreat.
For illustration: if our current home is valued at £700,000 we could borrow £420,000, and use that as a deposit on a home worth up to £1,050,000 by taking out a 60% RIO mortgage of £630,000.
Or is this too much of a risk at our stage of life?
Borrowing a total of £1,050,000 at 3% would incur interest payments of £2,625 per month, broadly in line with our expected *gross* rental income from our current family home.
But interest rates are at a record low - the only way is up. 6% would double the interest payments; 9% would triple them; 12% would quadruple them; and 15% (I was paying 15.75% in 1990) would quintuple them to £13,125 per month. We can mitigate the risk for a limited period with a fixed rate mortgage, and have the escape route of selling both our current home and my original flat to repay both mortgages in full at current estimated values.
So the risk would come from high interest rates *and* falling house prices. Is this a risk too far for a dream home for retirement? I have about four years to work this out. There are four substantially identical houses, all in a row, that we have our eyes on.
By 2005 the mortgage had been repaid, and I had 6 years of glorious mortgage free living.
In 2011 Clare and I bought a house together. £348,000, with £120,000 from a buy-to-let mortgage on my first home and a £228,000 mortgage on the house we bought. Clare had her own flat which she also rented out. We both worked full time and we each had rental incomes.
Rental income on my old flat and rental income from Clare's flat more or less covered both mortgages.
We are now in the fortunate position where we might go mortgage free again in three or four years time.
Can we risk repeating the trick to buy our dream home for retirement?
Mortgage our current home with a 60% buy-to-let loan.
Use that 60% as a 40% deposit on a Retirement Interest Only (RIO) mortgage for our dream seafront retreat.
For illustration: if our current home is valued at £700,000 we could borrow £420,000, and use that as a deposit on a home worth up to £1,050,000 by taking out a 60% RIO mortgage of £630,000.
Or is this too much of a risk at our stage of life?
Borrowing a total of £1,050,000 at 3% would incur interest payments of £2,625 per month, broadly in line with our expected *gross* rental income from our current family home.
But interest rates are at a record low - the only way is up. 6% would double the interest payments; 9% would triple them; 12% would quadruple them; and 15% (I was paying 15.75% in 1990) would quintuple them to £13,125 per month. We can mitigate the risk for a limited period with a fixed rate mortgage, and have the escape route of selling both our current home and my original flat to repay both mortgages in full at current estimated values.
So the risk would come from high interest rates *and* falling house prices. Is this a risk too far for a dream home for retirement? I have about four years to work this out. There are four substantially identical houses, all in a row, that we have our eyes on.