I have to be honest, I am somewhat confused about the concern here. The article quite correctly describes a scenario that could happen in a household situation for example when changing light bulbs, which is clearly dangerous. It then goes on to extrapolate this to some campervans, and then it has somehow been mapped onto the California.
The Cali has intrinsically only a 12v system, so there is no risk when changing light bulbs etc. So we can ignore any of the systems except the 240v, unlike the household scenario. The only 240v access point, unless one is servicing the 240v electrics, whilst plugged in to the 240v! is from the single socket in the kitchen unit.
However, the circuit breaker for this is a dual pole modern rcd, not an elcb type, which will cut off both live and neutral when turned off or automatically in the case of a fault in just a few mS, far faster than any fuse. It does this independently of which way around the inlet supply comes in, and similarly no equipment plugged in will care either. An rcd simply measures the difference in current between the live and neutral and uses any difference to power the trip, as it is ac power, it is independent of the polarity.
So I fully understand the general concern for household, some caravans and some campers, which the source article quite correctly describes, but not how it relates to the California. Can anyone clarify?