Top Gear review

It says what we all know.

The California is unique. It can be an every-day driver, a second car, a motorhome with limitations, something that with right traction and tyres you can bounce over almost any terrain, something you can use as a bridal car or a van to take rubbish to a tip.

The magic of a California superseded by a great big lump that fails on all of the above but is a half-decent great white, if you want to get into that market.
 
It says what we all know.

The California is unique. It can be an every-day driver, a second car, a motorhome with limitations, something that with right traction and tyres you can bounce over almost any terrain, something you can use as a bridal car or a van to take rubbish to a tip.

The magic of a California superseded by a great big lump that fails on all of the above but is a half-decent great white, if you want to get into that market.

Not forgetting, we don’t look like these bunch of pikey scroungers...

3121AC85-C50F-43D5-8240-49A93322A37D.jpeg
 
There was a test drive of the GC in Autocar too last week.
 
Well a lot of members actually for some reason dammingly do compare and there is no comparison except the California name.

It’s not the same market.
 
Agree. Totally different market.
 
Agree. Totally different market.

Shame they couldn’t find a completely different name to suit the completely different van...
 
Last edited:
That's marketing. The boffins thought that a "family" name would offer familiarity and broaden the market for the vehicle.

Based on some of the responses on here it appears to have had the opposite effect!
 
Back
Top