Why do so many use PCPs to aquire new vehicles? Yes, the customer drives away in a shiny new vehicle that otherwise he/she probably couldn't afford. However, look deeper and almost everything else is to the dealers/manufacturers advantage.
Unless you stump up a small fortune, you are tied to that contract for it's duration and even then you don't own the vehicle. Things get even more costly still if the strict conditions aren't followed. If you fail to service it correctly, damage it and/or exceed the annual mileage etc, the overall costs can soar. Since the vast majority of people will not have sufficient funds to pay off the final balloon payment/GFV then the dealers/manufacturers know full well that the customer will almost certainly opt to replace that vehicle with another shiny new one on yet another PCP.
Here's an article on PCPs that's worth a read:
The personal contract purchase (PCP) is the most popular type of finance for both new and used cars in the UK. The Car Expert has the most comprehensive and independent guide to PCP car finance, to help you understand exactly how it all works.
www.thecarexpert.co.uk
The most startling thing about this article is the following paragraph:
"Despite its enormous popularity in recent years,
research from 2015 found that a staggering 88% of men and 75% of women could not explain what a PCP was. A
more recent study found that nothing has changed, with about 90% of people not understanding the fine print in their finance contracts".
I've always felt that PCPs are very little more than a racket. The above paragraph tends to bear that out. If the motor trade are flogging these contract plans to all in sundry knowing full well that most of their customers don't really understand what they are signing up to, then that is just what it is.
Having said that, I concede that buying a California on PCP with a view to long term ownership MAY well be a reasonable proposition due to it's incredibly slow depreciation. I really don't know as it's not something that I have ever looked into. However, for anyone contemplating this, it's worth considering the following excerpt from the same article. "Statistically, there’s about a 90% chance you won’t have enough cash available to pay off your balloon/GFV amount at the end of your agreement to keep your car, so you’d have to borrow more money to pay off the balloon. Yet you have already paid interest on the balloon amount, so you are paying more interest on that money all over again".
Regarding the future value of ICE Californias, well who knows? Personally I'm not that concernered about future depreciation for the following reasons:
1. I didn't buy any of our three Calis to date as an investment. I bought them to enjoy the lifestyle. The fact they depreciate slowly is a bonus but not the be all and end all.
2. I doubt if an Electric California will be available in the very near future. If I'm wrong and VW do pull one out of the hat, then will it be able to compete with the current van in terms of price, range, depreciation and more to the point practicality?
3. The vast majority of aspiring California owners won't be able to afford a EV Cali so the value of secondhand ICE Calis should remain firm.
4. I doubt if the average Cali owner enters inner cities much prefering instead to head for the wide blue yonder. I can't see why an ICE Cali wouldn't have a future outside of inner cities.
So if a PCP is your preferred choice to finance your van then for what it's worth, my bet is that there's no need to worry too much about a rapid drop in values of Californias.