chockswahay
Top Poster
VIP Member
So here's the thing. My van is in for radio replacement and the dealer have given me a loan car for the week. Now I thought at first I would like it................. but no, I don't feel the need to rush out and get one!
What has surprised me is how comfortable the Cali really is........ it's a nice place to be. I like the elevated position, the excellent all round vision (light and airey), the Captain's Chair comfort with the arm rests, the DSG gearbox, the sheer feeling of space and the rock steady ride that comes with a 3 ton vehicle.
By comparison the Golf is (slightly) claustrophobic, a little too fragile in it's ride, the manual gearbox is good but such a faff and does not provide that 'limosine' feel, the space is small, no leg room for rear passengers and a small boot.
Of course much of this is subjective and personal, and the two vehicles are a little 'apples and oranges' so I appreciate not such a fair comparison perhaps. Which leads me to the very point that compelled me to write this..........
The California is a surprisingly comfortable, agile and easy to drive vehicle (in fact I always look forward to driving it). Of course I'd get much the same warm glow if I had a Caravelle but then again I would not be able to pull up and have a cool drink or a hot brew and some freshly prepared food, let alone the notion of sleeping in the van.
Is there a down side to owning a California? Well yes of course......... expensive to buy and run and not best suited to driving like I stole it! On a 'per drive' basis the van is pricey on fuel (gotta admit that the 52 mpg the Golf did over the last 200 miles is impressive stuff!)
After considering if I should buy a small 'run around' for well....... 'running around in' I find I can't really get too excited about the idea.
THE CALIFORNIA HAS SPOILT ME!
What has surprised me is how comfortable the Cali really is........ it's a nice place to be. I like the elevated position, the excellent all round vision (light and airey), the Captain's Chair comfort with the arm rests, the DSG gearbox, the sheer feeling of space and the rock steady ride that comes with a 3 ton vehicle.
By comparison the Golf is (slightly) claustrophobic, a little too fragile in it's ride, the manual gearbox is good but such a faff and does not provide that 'limosine' feel, the space is small, no leg room for rear passengers and a small boot.
Of course much of this is subjective and personal, and the two vehicles are a little 'apples and oranges' so I appreciate not such a fair comparison perhaps. Which leads me to the very point that compelled me to write this..........
The California is a surprisingly comfortable, agile and easy to drive vehicle (in fact I always look forward to driving it). Of course I'd get much the same warm glow if I had a Caravelle but then again I would not be able to pull up and have a cool drink or a hot brew and some freshly prepared food, let alone the notion of sleeping in the van.
Is there a down side to owning a California? Well yes of course......... expensive to buy and run and not best suited to driving like I stole it! On a 'per drive' basis the van is pricey on fuel (gotta admit that the 52 mpg the Golf did over the last 200 miles is impressive stuff!)
After considering if I should buy a small 'run around' for well....... 'running around in' I find I can't really get too excited about the idea.
THE CALIFORNIA HAS SPOILT ME!