But think of the Pension savings of all those unclaimed pensions and other benefits. On which side of the equation do they go?
I'm just a simple medic - see - diagnose - treat to the best of my ability with, I'm proud to say, some good results. I think I'll leave all this analysis and The Crispin Family use of underpants, prefer boxers myself, to the " Chattering Classes " as they seem to get some kick out of it.
I'm sure you'll find someone else to argue the toss with, and I'm sure you and The Crispin Family would get on well together. You're almost next door to each other.
This thread is almost driving me to drink.
This thread is almost driving me to drink.
My issue is with the manner of many of the posts in this forum which have reverted to personal invective.
I have no idea who Tom is. But watching his considered and well articulated posts twisted into other meaning, and personal remarks flying his way has not been edifying.
So it is strange to watch a Feynman admirer doing so.
From what I know of the guy he was open minded. When one of the professors from my own research group won the famed Swedish prize the first congratulatory telegram arrived from RPF. There were others who resented it so much they are carping decades later.
Btw, amusingly, RPF was not even a member of the American Physical Society (though I was!) because he felt, with some justification, that such societies propogate smugness and close mindedness. People get high on titles and memberships was his view.
I actually have observed that he was very accurate about this.
So it was amusing to notice a high level consultant resorting to membership of a professional society as justification for Snowdon's conclusions.
Sorry, not buying the Snowdon conclusion, at least as of yet.
If you like Feynman's approach then look at the spirit behind it. He tended to dismiss most research in the social sciences as soft and shoddy, and unfortunately we have far too many examples to lend support to his disdain. Snowdon's claims are just claims.
As for this thread, it evolved as follows:
1. Complaint about a non British Citizen gaming the system.
2. Tom pointed out there was nothing illegal about it.
3. I pointed out that we end up paying for many costs that are knowingly incurred by some. As example, sat smoking and drinking.
4. WelshGas then cited evidence that smoking and alcohol were actually beneficial.
5. I tried to get answers from him but got insults.
6. Finally he posted detail about his background in the NHS.
7. I then explained why I was not convinced by the Snowdon paper at all.
Doubt if it as much evidence as WelshGas claims.
Anyway, I already got a response from the mathematician I mentioned earlier. His immediate response basically same as mine. Cost function definition is limited by choice.
Me too.This thread is almost driving me to drink.
Well you'll have to pay to get in. Pity the poor legend. Whatever has he done wrong to warrant such a meeting?God, I have to drive to Cardiff next week to meet one of the greatest Welsh rugby legends. If he is anything like you I better reconsider.
Luckily I think such traits do not run along national lines.
By the way your point about pensions falls flat because I already suggested that if dualling to death would be allowed at appropriate tax, the overall system would be financially better off. You did not address that point.
But Snowdon's and your point applied to dualling to death would yield unequivocal benefits for society.
Enjoy whatever you do. Leave the insults and OED definitions of your choice of insults aside for more pleasurable pastimes.
Be good.
Well you'll have to pay to get in. Pity the poor legend. Whatever has he done wrong to warrant such a meeting?
Did I do that?
Y
You mean....
Harry got the girl?
Good luck to him
Wet fart surelyOne day this rag will follow the News of the Screws and it will be fondly remembered a nothing more than a great cultural fart......
Nice bike MrSheen.Hell yeah
The VW California Club is the worlds largest resource for all owners and enthusiasts of VW California campervans.