Moakesy
Moakesy
VIP Member
So I've stuck this in the 'General' section as it's not related to Cali Insurance. My question relates to anyone who may have had experience of a similar situation.
My son hit a deer in his car the other night, and as a 20y/o lad he has a pretty big premium, so any loss to his 3 years of no claims discount (NCD) could potentially be expensive. The question relates to what insurance companies consider to be a claim worthy of removing the discount.
Details are:
- Front bumper damage, quoted £801 for parts/labour etc to fix it. This is the starting position and what it would cost by not going through insurance
- His excess is £500, so if he did go through insurance, he'll make a £301 'saving'
- However, he'll potentially lose his 3 years of NCD (which he couldn't protect due to his age), so when his premium is due next March, I've calculated that it will cost him an extra £320 'like for like' based on his current premium (i.e. his NCD was essentially worth £320 this year).
- Therefore he potentially could still be better off paying it directly when you think it will take another three years to build up the same level of discount.
Having done some Google searches, there is mixed feedback on if a no-fault, no-third party incident such as this would actually result in him losing his NCD. Some say it will, some say you are allowed one claim without it actually impacting NCD, and yet others say you might lose a bit of NCD, but not all of it.
Has anyone had experience of making a no fault claim whilst having non-protected discount. What happened to your NCD?
Thus far, we've not contacted the insurance company as soon as they know of even a potential claim, I don't trust them not to push up the premium regardless of if a claim is ever made.
And when I say it will cost him, I actually mean it will cost me, as the bank of Dad.
My son hit a deer in his car the other night, and as a 20y/o lad he has a pretty big premium, so any loss to his 3 years of no claims discount (NCD) could potentially be expensive. The question relates to what insurance companies consider to be a claim worthy of removing the discount.
Details are:
- Front bumper damage, quoted £801 for parts/labour etc to fix it. This is the starting position and what it would cost by not going through insurance
- His excess is £500, so if he did go through insurance, he'll make a £301 'saving'
- However, he'll potentially lose his 3 years of NCD (which he couldn't protect due to his age), so when his premium is due next March, I've calculated that it will cost him an extra £320 'like for like' based on his current premium (i.e. his NCD was essentially worth £320 this year).
- Therefore he potentially could still be better off paying it directly when you think it will take another three years to build up the same level of discount.
Having done some Google searches, there is mixed feedback on if a no-fault, no-third party incident such as this would actually result in him losing his NCD. Some say it will, some say you are allowed one claim without it actually impacting NCD, and yet others say you might lose a bit of NCD, but not all of it.
Has anyone had experience of making a no fault claim whilst having non-protected discount. What happened to your NCD?
Thus far, we've not contacted the insurance company as soon as they know of even a potential claim, I don't trust them not to push up the premium regardless of if a claim is ever made.
And when I say it will cost him, I actually mean it will cost me, as the bank of Dad.