Ever been stuck at the Brynglas Tunnels?You might not like people doing that, but so long as the lane separator is broken not solid, it is allowed: unlike driving at 71mph on the motorway, which is not allowed but universally accepted.
Ever been stuck at the Brynglas Tunnels?
As regards the 70 mph speed limit are you referring to your speed as displayed, or the actual speed ? Most Speedometers are set at 5% below the true speed. So would be perfectly legal to travel at 73mph as indicated on your display.
Ever been stuck at the Brynglas Tunnels?
Middle laners, worst drivers on the road and should be banned.
Fine in the inside lane...If we did that, everyone would be driving in either the inside or outside lanes.
I tend to set my cruise control at 58mph on the motorway and find my stress levels greatly reduced as I pootle along. No tailgating. No undertaking. No cutting up.
TARTs and FARTs. 30/40 All The Ruddy Time.How about the “40 F**ker”
Does 40mph everywhere thinking he/she is being safe.
You follow him/her for miles trying to find a safe overtake. When you get to the village the moron steams through at 40 ignoring the 30 then it takes you another 10 miles to catch/try to pass again.
Also the muppets that tailgate you through 30/40’s as if you’re holding them up, then when the limit opens up snd you boot it they’re nowhere to be seen!!
Prohibition of truck overtaking is quite common in Europe; beginning to be used in U.K.The common anoyance I come across is trucks overtaking in order to go 1 or 2mph quicker, andleading to tailbacks of frustrated commuters driving on each other’s bumpers.
Yes that is law in the UK too but people tend not to do it. I do confidently and smile sweetly at those who sat in the Lane a mile back causing the jam.The times I tailgate, is when the one(s) in front of me are just driving too slow.
I can not force anyone to go faster, but they force me to drive slower? If the max speed is set at 70km/h I want to drive that speed (if possible), not 65 or slower.
And the funny thing that most of you think is bad driving:
Nudging 1m from cones into merging traffic that had already politely merged 200m back
In Belgium it is the law to drive to full length of the lane before merging to the free lane. Anyone merging too soon cause more traffic jam because no one will let you merge. If you merge at the cones, you just use the "zip" method: one from the left, one from the right.
I have a wonderful example of this method, if you want I can upload the whole dashcam footage.
I came up at a highway, when the (Belgium) right lane was free, and before I came up, the left lane was completely full. So in your opinion, I had to drive up the highway, drive in reverse, to merge at the back of the traffic?
Where should I merge? Here somewhere, or at the cones, over 500 meter further?
View attachment 80621
Indeed, as stated in the Belgian law: 500 meter further:
View attachment 80622
Depends if the ACC lets meDo you continue at 70 thus undertaking the vehicle
If I undertake I will be committing an offence and potentially causing an accident, so I would move to the outer lane to overtake.Scenario.
Motorway. You can travel at 70 in the inner lane. Cars are whistling pass in the outer lane in excess of 70 mph.
You come across a vehicle in the Middle lane doing 60.
Question. Do you continue at 70 thus undertaking the vehicle or do you cross to the outer lane overtake then pull back into the inner lane?
It shouldn'tDepends if the ACC lets me![]()
The VW California Club is the worlds largest resource for all owners and enthusiasts of VW California campervans.