Those who owned a Defender or early Discovery in the 80s and 90s will remember the one-and-only obligatory accessory: a bullbar. Even if you never went to Finland (where there’s a reindeer on every corner) or North Africa (where free-range goats and donkeys are rife) you
had to have a bullbar. I was as guilty as everyone; all my five Defenders (and their predecessors) were armed with one. Why? I admit without shame: it looked macho and a Defender without one just looked
naked.
Naked bike racks everywhere...
It seems to me that bike racks fulfill the same role on today's Californias. Over the years that I’ve been on this forum I noticed that the original VW bike rack decorates probably 9 out of 10 Calis. But looking at the pics of those Calis there’s hardly ever one with bikes on the rack! Do those people actually have bikes I wonder? Or is a bike rack just a must-have accessory like the old bullbar on a 4X4? (Recently I even read a post by someone who claimed that they only bought a bike rack because it “just finishes off” their van.)
Living on the continent I notice that the original (expensive) VW bike rack is mostly installed on British Calis; Europeans tend to use cheaper removable racks (mostly Thule) that come off when not in use. Is it a cultural thing? Is a British Cali only a “real” Cali if it has a rack on the back, even unused? Is that why people photograph their Cali from the back (see above) if they have a rack?
Just wondering...