WelshGas
Retired after 42 yrs and enjoying Life.
Super Poster
Lifetime VIP Member
Probably the fact that TSI sales were poor compared to the Diesel. Californias are a niche market compared to Commercial vans overall.Similar experience to the two posts above. 3500 miles on the clock (about 6 months of use). 2500 of those doing city type drives (low speed / stop start / short distance). About 30 mpg achieved. Not comparable but I also brought a vw up at the same time as the van and that achieves nearly double the mpg of the van (55 mpg).
In terms of the drive, I find it quiet and smooth with plenty of acceleration and power when loaded. I wouldn’t tow with it as I would imagine the reduced torque would be found out but as I say, normal load it is not noticeable.
Beach 150 manual TSI.
Maybe this is a question for another post but does anyone know any specific reason petrol has been discontinued? Is it the CO2 was too high for new targets?
Factual responses only would be appreciated. I know some just don’t like petrol vans for various reasons / personal situations (for the record I have no issue with diesels) but I’m not really interested in specific use and preference arguments such as fuel costs or torque or sound but more why it made business sense for VW to discontinue as I presume it is about money?