I wonder if any anthropologists out there have thought of using a forum such as this to model the escalating mentality behind pogroms etc? Seed a discussion with a statement attacking an identifiable sub-group of society and see how others pile in.
Happily, for most sub-groups, the subsequent ill thought out, or even bigoted, comments are now seen as unacceptable. We did see a misleading comment about mosques a few days ago but happily that was soon damped down. In the popular current terminology, in that case, R<1.
But when the words ‘lycra’ or ‘cyclist’ are used, unfortunate behaviour is still apparently more acceptable. Even some of the more reasonable members of the forum have joined in.
The reality is that there are thoughtful and safe road users, bad road users and a spectrum in between. It is unhelpful to label them with the type of transport that they use or the clothes that they wear. Clearly users of some types of transport, when used badly, present a significantly greater risk than others. That is better explored through historical data and common sense rather than prejudice.
Use the roads safely; protect the NHS; save lives.