J
Jmooser
The usual used car dilemma, so I’d figure I’ll throw it out to the crowd and source some thoughts. I’ve got two VW Californias in sight.
-2004 2.5 174 4motion with 230k km
-2007 (late dec 2016?) 2.5 174 4motion with 125k km
The older one has full service history, oil changes on the long life (20-30k kilometers or every 2ish years). Plenty of parts recently replaced, the usual ones that wear down. Basically fully serviced as per schedule and decently maintained interior. All functions are working. As far as I can tell though the water pump has not been changed or needed to be changed (or they changed it and just missing that invoice).
The 2007 has been poorly maintained since 2012. But it only has driven 16k km from 2012-2016 and 8k km from 2016-2019. It’s had oil changes I suppose, at least once between 2012-2016 (although no service record during this time) and at least once 2016-2019. Batteries were dead when I checked it out last weekend. Control panel for camping functions was dead with ignition off (looks like a burnt fuse). It’s in decent shape, but some things have been replace with rough homemade solution (i.e. the parcel shelf). Also missing the rear mattress. Unable to enter the tent because the sliding roof part was jammed or something. Probably things that can easily be fixed.
What would you go for? Low miles or well known service history + treated pristinely.
The low mileage is roughly 40k GBP and the the older one is 32k GBP. The money difference isn’t a huge issue for me in the decision.
Was there anything radically different that makes a 2007 model better than 2005? Same engines after all...
What do you fellas think?
-2004 2.5 174 4motion with 230k km
-2007 (late dec 2016?) 2.5 174 4motion with 125k km
The older one has full service history, oil changes on the long life (20-30k kilometers or every 2ish years). Plenty of parts recently replaced, the usual ones that wear down. Basically fully serviced as per schedule and decently maintained interior. All functions are working. As far as I can tell though the water pump has not been changed or needed to be changed (or they changed it and just missing that invoice).
The 2007 has been poorly maintained since 2012. But it only has driven 16k km from 2012-2016 and 8k km from 2016-2019. It’s had oil changes I suppose, at least once between 2012-2016 (although no service record during this time) and at least once 2016-2019. Batteries were dead when I checked it out last weekend. Control panel for camping functions was dead with ignition off (looks like a burnt fuse). It’s in decent shape, but some things have been replace with rough homemade solution (i.e. the parcel shelf). Also missing the rear mattress. Unable to enter the tent because the sliding roof part was jammed or something. Probably things that can easily be fixed.
What would you go for? Low miles or well known service history + treated pristinely.
The low mileage is roughly 40k GBP and the the older one is 32k GBP. The money difference isn’t a huge issue for me in the decision.
Was there anything radically different that makes a 2007 model better than 2005? Same engines after all...
What do you fellas think?