Ozzy Pete
A bit of T-cut and a tank of petrol . Spain here we come......
They do have their place like all classics though. They are lovely to look at, and excellent if you like local journeys to shows and things. Where would we all be at the VW shows if no-one owned them.Back in the day when you could pick up a T1 or T2 for peanuts and buy spare parts for almost nothing and we’re prepared to get you hands permanently dirty they were great.
But today with vehicles that will get twice the fuel consumption and cruise along safely at 70 or 80 mph in comfort and quiet why would you really want something like this.
With prices of new Californias reaching ridiculously high prices and second hand ones pretty much the same people think the other option would be a T1 or 2.
If you had ever owned one in the past you wouldn’t be thinking that way.
Nostalgia ,rose tinted glasses and very deep pockets are keeping the prices sky high.
One careful owner ?If you are looking for a T2 with guaranteed mileage, I can recommend my parents one.
I can 100% guarantee it’s mileage for the last 35 years… ZERO!
View attachment 110669
The OP has a T6.1 Cali Already !Back in the day when you could pick up a T1 or T2 for peanuts and buy spare parts for almost nothing and we’re prepared to get you hands permanently dirty they were great.
But today with vehicles that will get twice the fuel consumption and cruise along safely at 70 or 80 mph in comfort and quiet why would you really want something like this.
With prices of new Californias reaching ridiculously high prices and second hand ones pretty much the same people think the other option would be a T1 or 2.
If you had ever owned one in the past you wouldn’t be thinking that way.
Nostalgia ,rose tinted glasses and very deep pockets are keeping the prices sky high.
Seeing the Sticker in the back window, is that why the van hasn’t moved in 35 years ?If you are looking for a T2 with guaranteed mileage, I can recommend my parents one.
I can 100% guarantee it’s mileage for the last 35 years… ZERO!
View attachment 110669
I agree what your saying, I know its going to be slow, drive like crap, brake like crap and struggle to keep up with the lorries on the M6, but it also wont be a everyday vehicle, probably get used once in a while, I have another 4 vehicles in the household so the daily chores it wont be doing, but something I can tinker with, and as im into detailing and looking after my vehicles I'll have it looking mint and keep on top of it and have some fun in it.Back in the day when you could pick up a T1 or T2 for peanuts and buy spare parts for almost nothing and we’re prepared to get you hands permanently dirty they were great.
But today with vehicles that will get twice the fuel consumption and cruise along safely at 70 or 80 mph in comfort and quiet why would you really want something like this.
With prices of new Californias reaching ridiculously high prices and second hand ones pretty much the same people think the other option would be a T1 or 2.
If you had ever owned one in the past you wouldn’t be thinking that way.
Nostalgia ,rose tinted glasses and very deep pockets are keeping the prices sky high.
Keep it relaxed, slow and steady and local and well maintained and it will be great fun. Our one was, it was when we wanted to go further distances on holidays in it as the kids got older that we couldn't carry on with it and had to move on. If I could have kept both though I would have !I agree what your saying, I know its going to be slow, drive like crap, brake like crap and struggle to keep up with the lorries on the M6, but it also wont be a everyday vehicle, probably get used once in a while, I have another 4 vehicles in the household so the daily chores it wont be doing, but something I can tinker with, and as im into detailing and looking after my vehicles I'll have it looking mint and keep on top of it and have some fun in it.
Or it could be a midlife crisis, and haven't got enough money for a Porsche.
As the designated driver, I only got pulled over once, even with about 10 passengers, which I put down to the sticker.Seeing the Sticker in the back window, is that why the van hasn’t moved in 35 years ?
Have you asked the owner for a full explanation?
if so what was the explanation?
Do you give a sing? Does it really matter if you have the van for a few months if not years. Live life and forget the sing. jFDIHi guys/gals im in need of some help, I went to view a UK/RHD 1971 VW bay-window bus the weekend and left a deposit(£200) The bus was very clean and had lots of money spent on it(No rust/Rot) and boxes of invoices and everything was mint on it, So I agreed a price which for the condition and mileage (55k) was above what you would pay (£16k) as there seem to be quite a few which looked OK for £2k less, but this van stood out from the rest.
Anyway I did a HPi check when I got home and it says there is a mileage discrepancy, and says as follows:
Date recorded Recorded by Mileage reading Total 14/07/1995 NMR 60000 60000 26/07/1995 NMR 63000 63000 03/10/2003 DVLA 20000 20000 20/04/2023 VOSA 55554 55554
All the MOT's all match up with the mileage from 2006 onwards, and a online MOT check also shows all miles/dates match, but obviously before it was all recorded by VOSA at MOT stations, back in the 90's it showed more miles then it has now as you can see above.
What would you do??? My head is saying leave it and its £200 lost, As if I come to sell in the future would I have the same problem when someone does HPi check.
Is this a common problem with old vehicles(never bought something this old) will I be having the same thing with other vans I view as most seem to be quite low mileage for there age!!!
As my great friend and wife says will it matter in 6 months? No!Hi guys/gals im in need of some help, I went to view a UK/RHD 1971 VW bay-window bus the weekend and left a deposit(£200) The bus was very clean and had lots of money spent on it(No rust/Rot) and boxes of invoices and everything was mint on it, So I agreed a price which for the condition and mileage (55k) was above what you would pay (£16k) as there seem to be quite a few which looked OK for £2k less, but this van stood out from the rest.
Anyway I did a HPi check when I got home and it says there is a mileage discrepancy, and says as follows:
Date recorded Recorded by Mileage reading Total 14/07/1995 NMR 60000 60000 26/07/1995 NMR 63000 63000 03/10/2003 DVLA 20000 20000 20/04/2023 VOSA 55554 55554
All the MOT's all match up with the mileage from 2006 onwards, and a online MOT check also shows all miles/dates match, but obviously before it was all recorded by VOSA at MOT stations, back in the 90's it showed more miles then it has now as you can see above.
What would you do??? My head is saying leave it and its £200 lost, As if I come to sell in the future would I have the same problem when someone does HPi check.
Is this a common problem with old vehicles(never bought something this old) will I be having the same thing with other vans I view as most seem to be quite low mileage for there age!!!
Na you should be able to get nearly 30mpg out of a standard 1600cc engined one, I used to get around 24mpg out of the one that I put a 1700cc Type 4 (aircolled) fuel injection one in on a decent run although that was a bit heaver around town. I ended up doing the Type 4 injection conversion for a couple of friends after that. 80bhp made all the difference from the 50bhp 1600cc unit!T2, owned 4 of them. Took my driving test in one back in 1976. Never got more than 18mpg (so 25mpg is a bit of a porky) and never past 60k without an engine rebuild. Great fun though, if you don't mind greasy hand prints everywhere
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
What’s that in the engine bay, NOS ?Here are a few pics stolen from the for sale advert.
Totally different beast to my T6.1 Ocean, and the slowest/oldest vehicle I will probably own ever
View attachment 110630
It's strange that I don't remember mine being particularly thirsty, not to the extent that it was something to remark on. What I do remember is that I did a straight swap for a Volvo 245 and that WAS thirsty, never more than 19 mpg, so the VW must have been doing a bit more than that.Never got more than 18mpg (so 25mpg is a bit of a porky) and never past 60k without an engine rebuild. Great fun though, if you don't mind greasy hand prints
@Greg&Mel Australian Cali - What's this worth down under? 1946 fully restored to as near original specification as possible.I have owned 7 VW’s: 2 beetles, a Karmann Ghia, a New Beetle Turbo, a Passat and lastly a Cali. Never owned a Kombi until now.
Beetles are great to drive, early Kombi’s less so as until they were equipped with 2L motors they used the 1100, 1200, 1500 followed by 1600 cc motors that were in the Beetles. Underpowered and always under stress.
A good, unrestored early Beetle is now selling for 20K and a reasonable Ghia for 50K in Australia. A good Type 2 for 20-50K and a good Type I starting at 100K.
These cars will continue to appreciate.
So buy the bus, look after it and will appreciate in value.
Our T1 split screen 1200 did a constant 18 mpg. We did many thousands of miles traveling all over Australia. You say 60k for an engine rebuild, did you mean 60 miles......It was the top speed that was mind blowing. We did see 45mph Once going down a long hill with lots of wind behind us..T2, owned 4 of them. Took my driving test in one back in 1976. Never got more than 18mpg (so 25mpg is a bit of a porky) and never past 60k without an engine rebuild. Great fun though, if you don't mind greasy hand prints everywhere
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Our T2 was two litre and used to do about 20mpg. It would cruise happily at 70mph from what I remember.Our T1 split screen 1200 did a constant 18 mpg. We did many thousands of miles traveling all over Australia. You say 60k for an engine rebuild, did you mean 60 miles......It was the top speed that was mind blowing. We did see 45mph Once going down a long hill with lots of wind behind us..
The VW California Club is the worlds largest resource for all owners and enthusiasts of VW California campervans.