Beware of colonial thinking. Remember many ‘developing’ countries skipped land lines and wired internet completely and went straight to mobile, as a result they have some of the highest mobile phone take up and developed their own tech for many things including mobile phone payment systems that‘s way in advance of ‘developed’ countries. May be more difficult with EV’s but not impossible e.g EV take up with low income people in China is high.
Also ‘hybrids’ could also be considered worst of both worlds, over engineered, poor IC and poor EV combined to green wash old tech, at least that’s what most are today
Agree.
Also remember that in countries such as China and India, the safety threshold is low (it does not need to be high, when you have to just potter around town, or drive on crowded highways rather than hurtling down towards London at 80 miles an hour in a high end car with 22 inch wheels) ... and so that puts a different spin on vehicle ownership and therefore also on EV adaptation in developing countries.
Based on western Standards, the safety rating may be low, but more than sufficient for the person buying it.
See the Range Rover Evoque knockoff below in China -
Did the person buy the above for safety or for show or for efficiency or ... something else?
If you measure against some of the safest cars, the cars in China and India are "unsafe" ... but that does not matter as the "unsafe" yardstick is as per the western media, based on western standards.
While the western countries deal with tackling climate change and spending money on mental masturbation, the China's and the India's of the world will continue to make money by providing services and continuing to increase pollution by building vehicles ...
I am not saying that climate change is wrong - we need global action than wishful thinking.
I think we need a new measurement for growth itself ... GDP etc are now outdated.
Someone give me a hybrid with a decent 150 mile range and without being overly heavy (the current hybrids top off at about 45 miles), I may consider one. Currently as
@willwander says, they are the worst of both worlds (but maybe classify as best considering that there are no other options).
It is a complex conundrum, but the world still rotates on its axis and shall continue to do so without us as well.