It would be great if a Cali LWB was offered. I mean why not?We would have loved a lwb California
Don't forget they could do away with the Leisure Batteries as well. Depends how the system is set up.Good afternoon,
My wife has a Toyota Corolla Hybrid. It is a nice car. It is impressive how it changes from the petrol engine to electricity and back. I have no idea how they do it, but it is brilliant.
I feel that it works best in stop and go traffic - actually it is almost ideal for that. Naturally on longer distances the impact is not so great.
My issue with Toyota is that I fail to see the benefit of the system. The car (well, at least in the way my wife drives it) still uses 5 to 6 /100 km (sometimes even more). This is too much for a Hybrid. That was almost achievable with the Polo she had before (ok the Polo is smaller, so I am not compare like for like).
I have no experience with "mild Hybrid" cars (actually I have to Google what this actually means) or with plug-in Hybrids.
But how this will work with camper vans or motorhomes is a mystery to me. The California Ocean is about 2.4 t ready to drive, loaded (as we all know) can be up a wee bit over 3 t when fully loaded. Even if the engine, clutch, transmission, tank is gone, the battery is rather heavy (and where to put it?).
I can't wait to see what VW (and in fact the other van manufactures) will introduce in the years to come.
Regards,
Eberhard
Of course! There would simply be no need.Don't forget they could do away with the Leisure Batteries as well. Depends how the system is set up.
I expect the winter testing is done at the same place, same time every year. These screen shots are of VW Audi test track, and the mountains where the off road vehicles are tested in Oman . There’s even a football pitch part way through the mountain route. (https://www.pressreader.com/oman/times-of-oman/20160221/281973196720735)Interesting.
I always wondered about these 'spy shots'.
So the photographer just happened to be standing at the side of the road in the snow in the middle of nowhere with their camera all set up when 2 prototype T7s just happened to drive by?
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
I actually like that more than the 6.1... now I see it rendered. Although the rear view is awful and the weird sloping roof?Just spotted these T7 renderings:
VW T7 Rendering Imagines The People Mover Based On New Spy Shots
The renderings propose a very modern look for the new Transporter with a massive lower grille at the front, positioned below the sleek headlights.www.motor1.com
Bland. Try again VW.I actually like that more than the 6.1... now I see it rendered. Although the rear view is awful and the weird sloping roof?
That looks way too small to be a T7...just look at the rear quarter window, and the height of the tailgate and roof compared to the size of the wheels. Probably next generation Touran, in spite of the photo shopped Multivan tag.Just spotted these T7 renderings:
VW T7 Rendering Imagines The People Mover Based On New Spy Shots
The renderings propose a very modern look for the new Transporter with a massive lower grille at the front, positioned below the sleek headlights.www.motor1.com
It’s also been announced that Ford will build the Amarok for VW, based on Ford’s Ranger. i.e. the VW Amarok will just be rebadged/ slightly tweaked Ford Ranger. The above graphic suggests the same fate for the Transporter and Cali (except for a possible electric version).If I’m interpreting the following correctly (from VWCV’s Twitter feed), it seems that Ford will built the diesel powered ‘T7’ and any ‘electric T7’ would be based on a joint Ford/ VW modular electric drive platform.
So the T6.1 could be the last California model built solely by VW.
View attachment 64068
From the pictures, this looks like a Sharan substitute, too small to be a T7.Maybe VW just gave me a reason to keep my T5.1 forever?
I didn't like the Sharan, apart from it's versatility.
We'll see how it will work out.
The T7 may well be a re-badged Transit...From the pictures, this looks like a Sharan substitute, too small to be a T7.
That document says Ford and Volkswagen will each continue to produce their own commercial vans.If I’m interpreting the following correctly (from VWCV’s Twitter feed), it seems that Ford will built the diesel powered ‘T7’ and any ‘electric T7’ would be based on a joint Ford/ VW modular electric drive platform.
So the T6.1 could be the last California model built solely by VW.
View attachment 64068
Not quite - what it actually says that they will both VW and Ford will build some CVs each, but not build all of what they will sell under their brands, I.e. they will sell vehicles developed and built by the other.That document says Ford and Volkswagen will each continue to produce their own commercial vans.
Good afternoon,
I just came in from the garden after a tidy up from yesterdays storm, putting up my feed for a wee bit and looked at some web pages. In a German newspaper webpage there was an articel about the VW Transporter line with a new picture of the T7.
I attacched a screenshot (hoping not getting into trouble doing this. If you believe I will, let me know and I will delete the attachment and put in the URL to the newspaper's webpage.)
I will read the articel later and have another good look about the T7 to decide if my first impression is positive or negative. I wonder what other people think about it?
Happy California,
Eberhard
View attachment 68131
Looks far too big to be a Sharan to me.. The Windscreen looks wider than the T6 behind. It looks like they’ve lowered the roofline by about an inch and reduced the ground clearance by another inch and it makes it look a lot lower! More in line with the MP.Delete the pic, or VW will disable all future software updates to your Cali.
Jokes apart, someone did post that pic on one of the thread. It looks more like a replacement for a VW Sharan more than the Cali. Look at the side profile, the wheels and also the doors.
The VW California Club is the worlds largest resource for all owners and enthusiasts of VW California campervans.