calibusje
Top Poster
VIP Member
- Messages
- 1,500
- Vehicle
- T6.1 Coast 150
Although the latest editions of the T4 westfalia are the most sought after (and most expensive), so it does come true, I can understand @2into1 his statement about people preferring the old one because indeed: maybe it won’t be this time… now we all have to renounce conventional fuels and the electric (and hybrid) vehicle is the supposed future. I myself hope for alternative synthetic fuels but that’s another story.
That article about the ‘t7 multivan california’: A lot has been written about the t7 multivan in this forum and let’s say not all that positive. Well, everyone has their own opinion. This is mine: Whenever I can, I check out the t7 multivan and sit in it, front and back. It is a familiar environment and does not look futuristic like the ID BuZz. For me this is a plus (although I have nothing against the latter; ok, I do: the price setting). The exterior rather appeals to me and the duck's beak and old Citroën monovolume jokes have been milked out (someone will certainly not be able to restrain themselves and still place another one, I'll chuckle and move on ). Yes, the looks can be debatable, but does this not apply to almost everything? Nor I think the transporter is the most beautiful van but I like it. Anyway, of the small campers it is the one that appeals to me the most and that's what it's about for me, the general look of the camper and this is more than the look of the van on which it is based. I like to use this one-liner: it wasn't so much the Volkswagen that I wanted but the California. Both for the appearance, the layout and its features.
The space inside a t7 multivan is spacious enough for a small campervan like the california. The furniture and bench will probably be adjusted to the volume of the interior, so the living space will remain about the same as it is now.
I am very happy with our t6.1 cali as a campervan: it’s everything we wanted and expected. Unfortunately, this is not the same as being satisfied: there is no way the transporter can hide the fact that it is more than 20 years old, although it tries very hard. I was expecting a mature product and that is a bit disappointing. The issues I had in the beginning, are not even influential in my opinion, it's just the general feeling I have when driving around.
Note: I don't feel unhappy while driving and I regularly have a smile on my face, but I attribute this more to the campervan feeling than to the transporter base. I suppose it will be better in the t7 multivan. If there is a full-fledged camper successor to the current california on this base, I would be very interested in it. I really have yet to see this happen, because the t7 is a people carrier and not a camionette in itself. I think they are rather enlarging the california family but that's just a guess.
If convinced, I’d sell our current one and take the step. Not at first but after a while, see which way the wind blows.
So, I am a bit more than mildly pro a t7 multivan bases california I just still don’t see it happen and expect the true successor to still be based on Ford's new Transporter
That article about the ‘t7 multivan california’: A lot has been written about the t7 multivan in this forum and let’s say not all that positive. Well, everyone has their own opinion. This is mine: Whenever I can, I check out the t7 multivan and sit in it, front and back. It is a familiar environment and does not look futuristic like the ID BuZz. For me this is a plus (although I have nothing against the latter; ok, I do: the price setting). The exterior rather appeals to me and the duck's beak and old Citroën monovolume jokes have been milked out (someone will certainly not be able to restrain themselves and still place another one, I'll chuckle and move on ). Yes, the looks can be debatable, but does this not apply to almost everything? Nor I think the transporter is the most beautiful van but I like it. Anyway, of the small campers it is the one that appeals to me the most and that's what it's about for me, the general look of the camper and this is more than the look of the van on which it is based. I like to use this one-liner: it wasn't so much the Volkswagen that I wanted but the California. Both for the appearance, the layout and its features.
The space inside a t7 multivan is spacious enough for a small campervan like the california. The furniture and bench will probably be adjusted to the volume of the interior, so the living space will remain about the same as it is now.
I am very happy with our t6.1 cali as a campervan: it’s everything we wanted and expected. Unfortunately, this is not the same as being satisfied: there is no way the transporter can hide the fact that it is more than 20 years old, although it tries very hard. I was expecting a mature product and that is a bit disappointing. The issues I had in the beginning, are not even influential in my opinion, it's just the general feeling I have when driving around.
Note: I don't feel unhappy while driving and I regularly have a smile on my face, but I attribute this more to the campervan feeling than to the transporter base. I suppose it will be better in the t7 multivan. If there is a full-fledged camper successor to the current california on this base, I would be very interested in it. I really have yet to see this happen, because the t7 is a people carrier and not a camionette in itself. I think they are rather enlarging the california family but that's just a guess.
If convinced, I’d sell our current one and take the step. Not at first but after a while, see which way the wind blows.
So, I am a bit more than mildly pro a t7 multivan bases california I just still don’t see it happen and expect the true successor to still be based on Ford's new Transporter
Last edited: