Perhaps if you made your point more clearly you wouldn’t need to give up?
My point is simple. I own a few cars, hybrid, petrol and diesel.
I am looking at total cost/mile for my next car. One I am considering is an i4 which has a range of 300 miles.
One consideration is lease cost vs cost of ownership of an equivalent ICE car. My calculations (summarised earlier in this thread), are an i4 costs a similar amount per annum as a used GOLF GTi Mk 7.5 - another car I am considering.
Yes, an i4 is not equivalent to a Golf. It’s far bigger & more expensive. The rationale for the choices? They both excel in their respective classes. By gathering data (my mate runs Collecting Cars & used to run Pistonheads, so I trust the source), the total annual costs of ownership were similar - buying GTI vs leasing a used i4. To simplify the calculations, I ignored the opportunity cost of capital in leasing vs buying and retaining the underlying asset.
The next element of cost of ownership would be fuel/charging.
My current diesel averages long term 40 MPG. I was generous and gave a modern equivalent diesel a hypothetical 50 MPG.
I have long term data for an i4 charging using Octopus at home. £35 converts to 1,200 miles.
I simply converted the 1,200 miles into a price at the pump for diesel. 1,200/50 = 24 gallons. Using a long term assumption of £1.50/L at 4.546 L/gallon equals £163.65 for 1,200 miles.
For simplicity I have ignored the tax, BIK, VED etc from this.
I’m all ears as to why this is flawed logic?