Surely that assumes VW hold the design, not just a brief? I would imagine (and I have a lot of supply chain experience, but not in automotive so it might be different) VW would provide a specification rather than a design, say we need a product with a mesh vent front, left and right, a panoramic front, and with these dimensions to fit our bodyshell/roof. We want it waterproof/breathable and these are the acceptable colour ranges. Then the supplier goes away and actually decides the actual technical design, e.g. stitching, material choice etc.. to meet that design brief?
In addition, VW are likely to be commercially savvy; if the design sits with the supply chain partner, they will be liable for all these associated costs rather than VW ("your product hasn't met specification") . . . if VW did the design and therefore were directly liable, you would have thought (?!) they'd be acting more promptly to resolve the issue given they can't pass the costs on to anyone, whereas a comparatively small SCP might instead be desperately trying to fix the issue (which seems evident, 03S, 03S-C, 04S, 05S) but genuinely struggling to make it work.
I don't know . . . it's all speculation without having transparency of what's really going on. Interesting matter for discussion though.