Borris
Super Poster
VIP Member
I wouldn't want to make an insurance claim on an untaxed vehicle. Insurance companies don't need much of an excuse to reject a claim and leaving aside the odd exceptions, if the vehicle isn't taxed it shouldn't be on the road. I am sure that many Insurance Companies would also take that view especially if it concerns a potentially expensive pay out. If the vehicle is an expensive Cali why would anyone take that risk?It turns out that three times as many people aren't bothering to pay anyway, since the tax disc was abolished:
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2...s-tax-disc-abolition-vehicle-excise-duty-dvla
More people might pay for tax and insurance if both the chances of being caught were higher and the fines once prosceuted, always greatly exceeded the cost of the original VED and Insurance costs. It is all too common to read in the local papers that so-and-so has been fined £190 or so for driving without insurance. If you have that mindset, then what incentive is there to buy expensive motor insurance when the chances of getting your collar felt are negligible and if you are, your'e only likely to get a small fine that is nowhere comparable to the cost of insuring. The current system seems as if it were designed to encourage more people to break the law.
Not having the money isn't a valid excuse.
Last edited: