Are prices due to crash?

Seems that in Transporter world 95k miles isn’t really considered as being an issue.

In California world 95k miles some would consider its past its useful life.

Odd, seeing how they are the same base vehicle.
 
To take the mystery out of this 66 blackberry van it has a full VW service history It was our daily drive from new and served us well but getting to the stage when given it mileage and age for us it was time to move it on. No hidden history.

Great buy for someone
 
Seems that in Transporter world 95k miles isn’t really considered as being an issue.

In California world 95k miles some would consider its past its useful life.

Odd, seeing how they are the same base vehicle.
There are a number of people who see the California as an ‘extra’ and always want a newer one on the driveway. The camping layout and experience hasn’t really changed since the T5 was introduced in 2003. My 2012 is still ace - drives and camps brilliantly.
 
I wouldn’t go for a T with 95k or a cali I think it’s more to do with what you can afford (budget) unless you are someone who likes to keep from new.
I would sell around the 85k mile mark, but who know may run my t6.1 van into 100s
 
This cheap T6 has split the camps. Looking at what some are asking for late T5s (not 5.1s) with over 100k miles, this looks value to me (dsg, euro 6, comfort dash). Vans get harder to maintain (parts not service) based on age not miles, so I think it's a good prospect for those that thought they were looking at buying a much older van.
 
Back
Top