Hi Tommy Gun
Problem is we have no money to pay for the services we enjoy courtesy of being part of the UK. Scottish Power is owned by Spanish - Whisky belongs to USA and Indian companies (only Scottish Water is home owned) and the best paid jobs are from Government posts i.e Faslane etc.
Our Uni did a study of our economy and it is quite frightening. As you know governments don't have money except for taxation and the taxes of 60 million are better for supporting a country than those where only about 2 million pay any tax.
As for independence where would we stand giving over all power to the EU????
Hi Digger,
I see the conversation has moved on quite a bit since I last logged-in!
Tried to PM you & discuss it out of this thread (& stay out of the bun fight) but can't seem to send PM's at the moment.
In all honesty, I had little faith in any of the financial figures produced that were used for & against the independence referendum back in 2014. I think both sides were at it - figures massaged & arranged to suit a particular side's view. Who to trust... finance is not my game.
I see pro's & con's with brexit. It'll hurt some & benefit others of course - main thing is that it was a fully democratic & fair process, as mentioned by others. England voted out, Wales voted out. As we are hearing, the game-changer for us is that Scotland, as a nation, clearly didn't want that overall result & it will now be seen as that 'material change' previously mentioned (to quote the First Minister's words.) This of course may be seen as undemocratic by other parts of the UK. Mind you, she did warn of this a while back, when a remain vote seemed virtually guaranteed
If NS thinks she can pull it off, she'll go for it. She would need support for a future deal / arrangement with the EU. If she gets some kind of offer, then she'll put that to the vote in well-timed fashion. It could be backed-up with regular co-ordinated meetings & visits from EU chiefs, voicing approval & all pitched as a genuine alternative to UK membership.
Marriage of convenience? Perhaps. The SNP aim for independence & some form of EU financial backing/cuddle. The country is placed back in the EU to appease the majority of voters that wanted to remain. The EU get part of Britain back in the process & get to save some face, to help keep their grand 'project' on track. They'll be looking for any good news after being dumped by the UK.
Looking at some of the countries that the EU are considering for membership
, I would be amazed if they were unwilling to re-absorb Scotland as a singular entity, should it offer itself up. We are already familiar with the standards expected. I can't see the EU doing the UK any favours, over & above whatever they absolutely have to. I also don't think they will avoid the Scottish question, as they did last time (as a favour to DC) - not now. Being back in the EU could also be pitched as front of the queue with America.
If NS can get the sums to look half-decent & there is a referendum, then I honestly think there is a strong chance Scotland will leave.
Agree with your comment regarding independence / handing powers to the EU. Not exactly full independence, but we did tolerate some of that as the UK in the EU.
Interesting times ahead, whatever happens. Main thing is that it is democratic
If a referendum is offered, I'll be keeping an open mind.
Cheers
Tom