Never. I think that it's much more likely that it will finally dawn on all those concerned that EVs aren't the answer. I beleive that will happen long before that point is ever reached. Pure EVs are useful but not everywhere and certainly not for all applications.You're all an educated and well read bunch, so what year do you feel that electric charging points will match the number of Diesel/ petrol points and therefore start to outnumber Diesel / petrol pumps?
EVs will only ever work as city cars. Nearly every socket in your home is a potential charging point, so they already outnumber the number of diesel/petrol points. So following this pedant's point, the question is whether rapid charge points will outnumber diesel/petrol pumps, and I cannot possibly know the answer to that. If it takes ~5 minutes to refuel at a pump and ~30 minutes to re-charge at a rapid point, you might expect the crossover to occur when the number of EVs are about a sixth of the number of ICEVs.You're all an educated and well read bunch, so what year do you feel that electric charging points will match the number of Diesel/ petrol points and therefore start to outnumber Diesel / petrol pumps?
Good answer, but plus sockets are usually 24 hour charge, sigh, so I suppose I did mean super dooper fast charging points, but again, are Extinction Rebellion groups looking at EVs as the transport 'green' alternative?EVs will only ever work as city cars. Nearly every socket in your home is a potential charging point, so they already outnumber the number of diesel/petrol points. So following this pedant's point, the question is whether rapid charge points will outnumber diesel/petrol pumps, and I cannot possibly know the answer to that. If it takes ~5 minutes to refuel at a pump and ~30 minutes to re-charge at a rapid point, you might expect the crossover to occur when the number of EVs are about a sixth of the number of ICEVs.
I expect they'd like to see more cycling, more rail travel and EVs used between station and destination.Good answer, but plus sockets are usually 24 hour charge, sigh, so I suppose I did mean super dooper fast charging points, but again, are Extinction Rebellion groups looking at EVs as the transport 'green' alternative?
I think never. I suspect there are vast numbers of vehicles out there that never do more than 300 miles in one day and will never need a public charge point. Pretty sure my wife's car never has. I would replace it with an eV in a heartbeat except it would cost me twice as much for a car half as good.
For those that do more than 300 miles per day we need another solution.
The problem with averages is its an average. People may have low daily mileage but make a number of longer trips during the year so an electric car with 150 mile range is no good to them.Completely agree. Four out of five UK drivers do less than 10,000 miles per year - that's an average of 27 miles a day - so for most people, very few days will involve a need to top-up charge. Even ignoring the long range Tesla, most of the current generation of EVs can do 150 miles on a charge even in winter conditions.
If EVs do take off (and that's a big if), I image motorway service stations will look similar to today's, but just about every parking spot will have a charging point, and a great chain of pylons will be leading from the nearest wind farm, solar farm, nuclear reactor or tidal barrier to an electricity substation at the service station.The problem with averages is its an average. People may have low daily mileage but make a number of longer trips during the year so an electric car with 150 mile range is no good to them.
I also don't buy that rapid charging is going to take off. Lets assume charging a 45 kWh battery in 45 minutes. That would need a power requirement of 60kW, assuming it was 100% efficient . Using a 3 phase supply (415v) that would need over 80 amps per phase to a single charging station. For comparison, the supply to my house is single phase and fused at 100 Amps. Despite what the EV lobby say about charging, the laws of physics will continue to apply.
When was the last time you heard a chartered power engineer being interviewed about the problems of balancing the grid with the dramatically variable "reusable" inputs with the diminishing nuclear base load and at the same time avoiding the use of the evil hydrocarbons.The problem with averages is its an average. People may have low daily mileage but make a number of longer trips during the year so an electric car with 150 mile range is no good to them.
I also don't buy that rapid charging is going to take off. Lets assume charging a 45 kWh battery in 45 minutes. That would need a power requirement of 60kW, assuming it was 100% efficient . Using a 3 phase supply (415v) that would need over 80 amps per phase to a single charging station. For comparison, the supply to my house is single phase and fused at 100 Amps. Despite what the EV lobby say about charging, the laws of physics will continue to apply.
I'm not sure EVs need to be cheaper than ICEs in terms of purchase price, only cheaper in terms of purchase price and medium term (5-10 years) running costs combined.Affordability is the key. As soon as EVs are better and cheaper than ICE, adoption will be swift.
The technology will improve massively as each year goes by, battery development creating longer range, quicker charging, better charging networks and more affordability. We will see inductive charging with no need for cables on pavements etc, more charging whilst driving ie. solar, regenerative, also cars giving back electric to the national grid at peak times to enable charging at a cheaper rate off peak etc etc.
Not sure the general population are that sophisticated in their decision making and will subconsciously attribute greater significance to any upfront cost l, loan commitment etc than to ongoing maintenance / running costs.I'm not sure EVs need to be cheaper than ICEs in terms of purchase price, only cheaper in terms of purchase price and medium term (5-10 years) running costs combined.
As a Tesla and a Cali owner, I often time the detour to a garage, queue, fill and pay. It’s always 10-15 mins.
Time to supercharge in Dundee 20-30 mins. but I can go for a pee, get a snack, walk the dog.
so for a rare long journey, Leaving home with the Tesla on full charge, and then stopping at a supercharger (usually conveniently placed on a motorway like in Perth or Dundee), means a well planned Aberdeen to Carlisle trip takes about same time in a Tesla than it does in Cali.
day to day travelling. I can easily charge every 4th or 5th day at home. Or detour to a charger next to ikea, coffee shop or dog walking destination. And that would be a free charge (in Scotland)
100% electric transport is very achievable for most people. With cars. Sadly, I think an electric Cali is a long way off.
I doubthat batteries with rare earth metals are better in the long run. But I know I’m contributing to cleaner air in our towns and cities.
I think EV's will play their part but mainly for commuting short journeys as it's been said before there is a limit and they are not the answer and I'm still wondering where all this wonderful electricity is going to come from when we can't even boil a kettle in between an England match![]()
I think EV's will play their part but mainly for commuting short journeys as it's been said before there is a limit and they are not the answer and I'm still wondering where all this wonderful electricity is going to come from when we can't even boil a kettle in between an England match![]()
The VW California Club is the worlds largest resource for all owners and enthusiasts of VW California campervans.